The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, Volume 86, July 1982 - April, 1983 Page: 444
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Southwestern Historical Quarterly
the historical method and should be held accountable for his lack of
incisive research. His sources consist mainly of newspapers, a few sec-
ondary works, and over ninety interviews with members of the indus-
try and the commission. He refused to reveal the names of those inter-
viewed because they would not "discuss the subject freely unless they
were promised anonymity" (p. vii). Such a procedure is unacceptable.
At the least, Prindle might have cross-checked his information with the
thirty-five feet of material in the Oral History of the Texas Oil Indus-
try housed in the archives at the University of Texas at Austin. The
archives include at least three other collections with material relevant
to subjects raised in the book: the Thomas Stalworth Henderson Pa-
pers, the James Stephen Hogg Papers, and the Garrett Hobert Nelson
Papers. With the exception of the published diary of Harold L. Ickes,
Prindle uses no national sources; and yet, he claims the commission
greatly affected national petroleum policies.
Such poor scholarship damages what might have been an interesting
and important work. In fact, Prindle offers a rather fascinating, though
conservative and unsupported, thesis: the commission's alleged favori-
tism toward the small producers, while inefficient in some respects,
actually resulted in positive accomplishments, those being the enhance-
ment of the Texas economy and the eventual conservation and recov-
ery of oil and gas reserves. For his argument to work, Prindle must
distinguish in a meaningful manner between the "majors" and the "in-
dependents" in the industry. He defines majors as those firms that inte-
grated any of the four operations in oil and gas: production, transpor-
tation, refining, and retail selling. Independents he defined as those
who did not integrate. Such a generalized dichotomy appears question-
able, given the diverse and dynamic aspects of business in Texas and
the lack of research Prindle performed. In his analysis, moreover, Prin-
dle confuses the issues. He maintains the commission protected the in-
dependents from competition and thus ensured every producer a piece
of the action, whether he was efficient or not. Yet he argues that this
policy encouraged risk-taking on the part of the independents, a prac-
tice usually associated with highly competitive and unregulated indus-
Thus, Prindle's argument is circular; he proved that which he de-
fined. A definitive analysis of the oil and gas division of the Railroad
Commission and its relation to Texas and the nation remains to be
University of Georgia
WILLIAM R. CHILDS
Here’s what’s next.
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Periodical.
Texas State Historical Association. The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, Volume 86, July 1982 - April, 1983, periodical, 1982/1983; Austin, Texas. (texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth101209/m1/492/: accessed January 21, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, texashistory.unt.edu; crediting Texas State Historical Association.