Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0180 Page: 3 of 4
This text is part of the collection entitled: Texas Attorney General Opinions and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
The Honorable James Caleb Henson - Page 3 (KP-0180)
reduced the county funds that make up the county component of the judge's salary, its reasons for
not including the county judge in the longevity pay policy are immaterial for purposes of
subsection 26.006(c). Accordingly, subsection 26.006(c) of the Government Code does not
preclude a longevity pay policy that excludes the county judge, provided the policy does not
effectively reduce the county judge's salary to offset the county judge's State salary supplement.
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This text can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Text.
Texas. Attorney-General's Office. Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0180, text, February 15, 2018; (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth1051076/m1/3/: accessed April 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.