Art Lies, Volume 2, May-June 1994 Page: 4
Te is a spe auntin Houston ... - No,
ard zing anyc 1orizing, t us advertise ours
Cu little ship still afloat! ere warp nopw, ei
Our purpose continues,to be provi 4dei
diverse- arnd a li le'divisive - diS ose abIL
and artists on a&d there Forit
ex dance of artwoFks, art sho $
gre space-age cow- n, ard Sitf
un . resses and blhr-convelptional
etty darn . reviews, promo s and odt
constrainelt ulfill the ne essa l on of ac
a predomin t art-uninvolv'edrfovw~right art-a
applaud tlei xpertise an 'imrgetic dedic
our fellow townsfolk about the bustling, abundant
continues to be. Yet inevitably they have to comF
other urban woes - and hence cannot possibly s
U _ E _ ' m _ ,
Sou may have notice
"- / V ARTlies is a bit sma
S o it or not, we've dow
money. Yes,.we are t
,nough of that before we start budget. Our idea is, ARTIie
elves - - ARTlies has returned! smaller until it is about the s
rtertain us! - . the same postage stamp e
)endent vehic or alternative, ' * e us donation Think of
t visual and p6 mance arts to a e taken! a
Iur perception that there is an of H ,vh~hout a sn
,and art happenings in is because g d art scene folks
ly not enough written abo t it to
neclia do their jobs, and do i
ler rite-ups. But they are
dre ing a widespread and
>ath ic audience. Certainly we
atio engaging and education
t art ecca that Houston
ete with Astros and Rodeos and
!e it all or say it all. Thus the
necessity of a self-willed, autonomous, potentially dangerous supplement: ARTlies.
What superheroes are to legitimate law-enforcement, ARTlies is to legitimate art
media. Our name is a catchy, slightly corny compound; our costume sleek, but
slightly outlandish; and, while protecting the innocent, we try to deliver a wisecrack
with every punch. However, our identities are not secret (for the most part).
Rather, if you have something to say, or some energy to contribute (editing,
str ' r 0o lya chng), YOU tco n e e
suerher4~ Ate , f
When we solicit your views or o or other permutations f voice, it is a call to
a gathering, to the collection of ideas and perspectives that constitute the life of a
community. Because these things happen from the ground up, our aspiration to be
all-inclusive is limited to those who contribute, directly or inadvertently. If our
limitations - demographic, ethnic, racial, aesthetic, religious, institutional, or media-
based - are only too apparent, then it is up to you, as well as us, to effect the
The politics of our art coverage and editorial policies is this: we have a rotating
editorship; a semi-permanent editorial board guides our aesthetic principles and
facilitates our quest for writers; and we solicit and accept reviews or other writings
primarily about visual art in Houston from whoever takes the time to put it on paper.
Having established our theoretical attitude(s) in ARTlies #1, in this issue of ARTlies,
we've tried to focus on reviews and reflective takes on the art experience. In our
humble, haphazard way, we set out to touch as many bases as possible from as many
angles as offered themselves to us. And if you feel we've missed anything, or missed
any points, we beg you to differ - that's what a discursive community is about! What
we want to give our readers is the sense that, in a community where occasions are
plentiful and press is scarce, every opinion (that is an opinion) should have the
opportunity to be reprinted and glorified - or reviled - in a glossy high-tech format.
Because every opinion has the right to become an art lie. *
that the page-size of
ler this issue. Believe
sized the mag to save
ying to work within a
will get smaller and
ze of a postage stamp
,eryone should use to
t to next April! Think
$4appy art mag! All
never got around to
showing a little support? Imagine that! We are all
adults who understand the nature of money, and
we know you want to see this mag continue, so we
know you will lick one of those "I Pledge
Allegiance ..." stamps you've got kicking around
and send us a contribution! And we know you'll do
it now. We know that.
By the way, we will be taking the summer off; we
plan to be back next Fall with a September/October
issue. We need your contribution to insure that
we'll still be here, spewing something about the
HOUSTON ART SCENE.
p.s. Special thanks to Lori Nelson and Janet
Meyer for helping get Art 2 off the
ground. And congratulations to Nestor
Topchy and crew on their new theater
space. Pizza Boy was a really wild romp
through a nuttily wonderful treat.
Here’s what’s next.
Show all pages in this issue.
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Periodical.
Chandler, Wade & Schwab, Eric Jonah. Art Lies, Volume 2, May-June 1994, periodical, May 1994; Houston, Texas. (texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth228035/m1/4/ocr/: accessed December 7, 2016), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, texashistory.unt.edu; .