Texas Attorney General Opinion: O-5079 Page: 1 of 4

                                
S' *

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN

GrgmALD C. MANN
Areras em~A

jaonaorable Mou Aten frownlee
hOairu  cemrStta eo
seovrfM  a ers tnrsttoa,
The Menate
Austin, Texas
uear Senator Bromlaeesg Opinin Nso
Rot
to   e
We beg to aeknowi   * 1
nska an opinion froms this d
the above subjet matter   sens
Seaster  1m Fain,      es    to y
ently aLpe te b  the o
trial AccI"on tdo is       $
serve naor the   to 14te

. r yor letter,,
St   h respet to
dt a letter tre
tin~g the foll o
bint, the wali-

p   e i     t~hits 2oS rd. It
- ~fs County Auditor
&nd he vWe so rlat th*
tan .    f this seta ment La
)orpinon that he cannot qualify
as an eployee rniber

Ieare ea o in receipt of in ormation aBowPg
the  .heaw   k as employed by th Bbrotbetroot        9sl
read rrmi4men as secretary of Rwell Ledge No. 10s,
Azarf llo9 upon a regular ontbly salary, aw vo v oanteRe
tously iuo eiployed until the d 4te of his appointuent by
the orvornor*
te beg to advise that it is the Ginion of this
deparWtnt, assunw, the eaots abo e stted to be true,
the notkneo is not eligible for the appotflnat,

NO COMMUNICATION IS TO BE CONSTRUED AS A DEPARTMENTAL OPINION UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR FIRST ASSISTANT