231 Matching Results

Search Results

Results: 1 - 24 next

[Letter from R. M. Wagstaff to T. N. Carswell - November 5, 1929]

Description: A letter addressed to Mr. T. N. Carswell, Abilene, Texas, from R. M. Wagstaff, Wagstaff, Harwell, Wagstaff & Douthit, Abilene, Texas, dated November 5, 1929. Cover letter by Wagstaff advising of an enclosed Charter of West Texas Automobile Club, Franchise tax receipt, etc.
Date: November 5, 1929
Creator: Wagstaff, R. M.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from A. G. Harper, October 31, 1929]

Description: Letter from A. G. Harper notifying delinquent taxpayers to send in their remittance to the tax collector to save other penalties or a tax suit. If the taxpayers find any error or they do not understand, they are to call the tax collector for such information.
Date: October 31, 1929
Creator: Harper, A. G.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to Sayles & Sayles, October 15, 1929]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to Sayles & Sayles stating a letter of agreement for a lawsuit. Stephens is not familiar with the suit and sees no reason to sign the agreement. Stephens recommends Sayles & Sayles asks the plaintiff's attorneys why Stephens signature is needed so urgently.
Date: October 15, 1929
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, April 30,1929]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing that Stephens will not be able to make it to the trial date for Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company.
Date: April 30, 1929
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to Jake L. Hamon Jr., January 27, 1929]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to Jake L. Hamon Jr. stating their best option for compromise in the case of Hamon and Ellis vs. U. S. Torpedo Company. Sayles states their greatest difficulty in the case will be proving negligence on the part of Jack Rapp. Sayles discusses different costs for damages of the oil well.
Date: January 27, 1929
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, May 16,1929]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing that no amended answer has been filed and both cases have been continued until the next term of court.
Date: May 16, 1929
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Telegram from David W. Stephens to Sayles & Sayles, October 9,1929]

Description: Telegram from David W. Stephens to Sayles & Sayles discussing if Stephens should be in Abilene with his people for the trial of Gulf Pipe Line Company vs Fulton on Monday and Fulton vs Gulf Pipe Line Company on Tuesday. He then ask if Fulton has amended in either case.
Date: October 9, 1929
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles. to N. T. Zachry, April 8, 1929]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to N. T. Zachry to subpoena Zachry to testify in the hearing of the case Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. J. W. Bettis and wife and tenants.
Date: April 8, 1929
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, January 8,1929]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the injunction of the case of A. D. Fulton vs Gulf Pipe Line Company. Mr. Sayles writes that the defendant's attorney C. L. Hailey would like to have a conference with him. He does not believe the case will go to trail this term.
Date: January 8, 1929
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen