[Draft of Plaintiffs' Answer to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Ben Rios, et. al. vs O.B. Ellis, et. al.] Page: 2 of 4

                                
SHT SII
fHWOO TOKTtIC iSCIATS (ETXKt?
u. s-T ' •r.iEi^iitf Hrtsrii'rjoe  rr HOT
woiervm MBRVoe
€00? «0R VOXTOA. JIVID
- , L v\; "
MlUa a;;,
■k
t ki wm^ uktax taoiH u. a
aoti iabahsa f::s amwa
f4I KhU, ^ ?j : mix
i -
iY
SBT ^10 iiaOOUM hk MLld ,E .0
•M MOSfEHl |Ifi&'X :Yo HOI In - 8A3ST
jjzmmao .w R^TOAW fXQ&2Hgfioit
tro LCX 0 #V  E .: .£
*E «jt tcuK ma •w a nt
#a,. , (,0 *H ,li tH .... T
♦a yuihh qua o : Li a .e r
n.K.; , m ■.. - , .J*
    '        
 aJJLk.'JI&LL.W&J- -i&HJfl W^iJL
radot
Bfilftilsfi nalnftoB II-OPP
iax*V tS aoi^/oH
t&mtfaX ,0 dqlM
t .''a
bix rsi-v trcrHr"T
nilJ
320, i'ltirl V;
5 'MTCJf'i n«i ,qii *0.. '
•IlltO (Il Mtipi mil
80?a air IrfolM ?I@T
•:T: , .V "j;" ' ••: ; -': .
Of Joetcfo Jon ofc «# |#
^4o% K>w^ s^K) . 3 ^ f \ xy X"
it lot w*om o9t& %k
UfttB .:•
attlSaialq daueoetf *©t! tm^dio Son eb uw *ia&r>«x ojfT
tV* s*ao* orf* •! *e«t d*i^ {tint «in ot sir asMorft*® #00 bib
tlvft? m tlva 0$ fw mstteMtm bib * * 3ml s&f
•Pinlbmexna Bkr.i si m&rt$ fttm&iqvi. 0$ f>m " -(.fed
\