190 Matching Results

Search Results

Advanced search parameters have been applied.

[Cause No. 6080-A: Defendants' Fourth Amended Original Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Original Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., discussing the complaints brought by A. D. Fulton and countering his claims of damage to his property by the Gulf Pipe Line Company and the Gulf Production Company. There are several notes written on the back of the last page. This document is unsigned.
Date: September 1931
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 14, 1930]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Co. vs. Fulton and Fulton vs Gulf Pipe Co. et all. The case had moved to the 104th District Court with no trail date set. Mr. Sayles was reaching out to Mr. Stephens to let him know that unless these cases are tried pretty soon it will be inconvenient for Mr. Sayles to participate.
Date: June 14, 1930
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 6885-A: Plaintiff's Amended Original Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 6885-A, Mrs. J. E. Drummond vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., stating the complaints of the plaintiff, Mrs. J. E. Drummond, of the defendants, Gulf Pipe Line Company and Gulf Production Company. The document lists the damages to Drummond's property in Taylor County, Texas and request monetary compensation from the defendants.
Date: June 28, 1928
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, September 15, 1931]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles delivering a judgment draft for the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company case. If approved, Stephens is to have the court sign and enter the judgment. Handwritten text at the bottom of the letter: "P. S. Please also check which of our requests...were published. DWS."
Date: September 15, 1931
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating he does not agree with Stephens' interpretation of another case against the Gulf Pipe Line Company as it requires too much of both parties involved. Sayles believes the trial judge may reset the time of the hearing during the same term of court.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen