43 Matching Results

Search Results

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 14, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating that resetting the Underwood case to the next week may not be possible due to another breach of the promise of marriage case that will be tried all week. However, it may be possible to reset it to the week of July 11. Sayles asks what Stephens wishes to do about the matter.
Date: June 14, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating he does not agree with Stephens' interpretation of another case against the Gulf Pipe Line Company as it requires too much of both parties involved. Sayles believes the trial judge may reset the time of the hearing during the same term of court.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson, 1932-06-27]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson discussing the amount of work this project requires and the time that Sayles would be away from his own law practice in Abilene. Sayles states that work is tentative and the discussion is not a binding contract. He asks about length of time in St. Paul, salary and royalties paid.
Date: June 27, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel in which John Sayles is asking if Mr. Neel is the attorney for N. E. Fielding. If Mr. Neel is the attroney John Sayles ask for home to sign and return an agreement for the resetting of the Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company court case.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen