The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
The Honorable Rodney W. Anderson - Page 3 (GA-0713) State, 921 S.W.2d 502, 504-05 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth, 1996, pet. ref'd) (considering reasonableness of probation conditions imposed in deferred adjudication under article 42.12 using the test from Tamez). A determination of whether a condition of probation is reasonable must be made on a case-by-case basis and is inappropriate to the attorney general opinion process. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. DM-437 (1997) at 1, 3; JM-898 (1988) at 5. We therefore conclude that a justice court may use an electronic monitoring device as a condition of deferment and probation for an individual found to have committed an offense under section 25.094, Education Code, if the use of the device in a given proceeding is reasonable, a determination made by the justice court in the first instance.