Condition of Texas Pavements: Pavement Management Information Systems Annual Report, 2008-2011 Page: 13
li, 52 p. : charts, ill., tablesView a full description of this report.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
.Ju - - ~ V-u r wrI - w - r - - - - _______ --
Texas Department of Transportation
Pavement Management Information System (PMIS)
Statewide FY2011
PMIS Substandard Condition Scores (Less Than 70)
Highway Systems: All
Mainlane Roadbeds:
All Roadbeds: IH, US, SH, BR, FM, PR, PA
Construction Project Limits Used: No
ACP Patching Used: Yes
Federal Funding: Both Elgible and Inelgible
Rating Cycle: Annual
Traffic Utility Average Highway Systems Utility Average
Overall Substandard (ADT * Speed Limit)
Utility Utility (<0.70) 1-27,500 27,501-165,000 > 165,000 IH US SH BR FM PR PA
Utility Average Lane Miles LOW MEDIUM HIGH
ACP Patching 86.51 5,874.0 82.95 84.68 89.50 88.23 84.13 88.24 95.94 85.73 92.73 100.00
ACP Ride 85.10 5,134.4 91.78 86.38 80.91 87.67 88.69 83.51 70.80 84.96 73.26 49.98
JCP Ride 56.36 1,173.5 90.63 63.92 54.45 62.83 57.51 54.20 53.46 47.18 47.80
ACP Alligator Cracking 89.45 3,950.3 92.03 90.21 87.65 92.29 87.58 87.67 88.65 90.47 92.35 99.78
CRCP Ride 67.67 1,085.9 80.20 75.51 67.21 72.35 66.25 62.60 63.04 65.18 53.07
ACP Failures 93.16 3,031.4 87.06 92.61 96.60 89.93 97.34 96.01 96.07 90.67 93.00 100.00
CRCP Portland Concrete Patching 80.58 704.2 73.61 66.77 81.26 75.14 81.10 88.26 84.50 79.20 100.00
JCP Portland Concrete Patching 77.65 534.2 87.03 71.67 78.07 78.21 75.42 75.49 88.18 87.58 100.00
ACP Longitudinal Cracking 95.95 865.5 98.73 97.69 93.41 92.58 94.31 94.49 93.18 98.01 96.70 92.55
JCP Failures 87.83 230.8 51.21 83.24 89.47 84.83 88.70 88.18 86.24 92.21 100.00
CRCP Punchouts 92.58 189.0 92.34 85.69 92.90 91.36 94.31 92.79 95.87 93.32 100.00
ACP Block Cracking 98.87 446.6 99.62 98.91 98.47 98.66 98.39 98.48 95.39 99.50 99.21 100.00
CRCP Asphalt Concrete Patching 98.09 57.5 91.52 100.00 98.05 98.39 98.31 97.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
ACP Transverse Cracking 99.02 58.3 99.43 99.15 98.73 98.62 98.67 98.64 97.36 99.50 99.92 100.00
CRCP Spalled Cracks 98.38 27.4 95.07 94.63 98.57 98.28 99.15 97.97 99.95 97.95 100.00
ACP Deep Rutting 99.67 57.2 99.41 99.54 99.88 99.90 99.87 99.78 99.97 99.47 99.99 100.00
JCP Failed Joints & Cracks 98.24 7.3 93.27 97.31 98.50 98.43 98.00 97.85 99.48 99.68 100.00
JCP Longitudinal Cracks 99.45 0.6 99.09 98.90 99.53 98.79 99.65 99.68 99.66 99.57 100.00
ACP Shallow Rutting 99.49 0.0 99.35 99.41 99.62 99.73 99.58 99.59 99.49 99.37 99.78 100.00
JCP Shattered Slabs 100.00 0.0 99.96 99.98 100.00 100.00 99.99 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00Miles Percent
Pavement Type Rated Substandard Substandard
Asphalt Concrete 174,344.5 91.39% 21,879.1 86.00% 12.55%
Continuously Reinforced Concrete 12,715.0 6.67% 1,969.8 7.74% 15.49%
Jointed Concrete 3,699.9 1.94% 1,591.9 6.26% 43.03%
Total: 190,759.4 25,440.81 1 13.34%
86.66 Percent of Lane Miles in "Good" or Better ConditionAverage includes all lane miles with Condition Scores below 70.
Substandard Utility Lane Miles are totaled lane miles of PMIS sections
that have Condition Scores below 70 and a utility value less than 0.70.PMIS Annual Report FY 2008-2011
Lane
13
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Texas. Department of Transportation. Condition of Texas Pavements: Pavement Management Information Systems Annual Report, 2008-2011, report, August 25, 2011; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth326678/m1/27/: accessed May 4, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.