Appraisal Practices of Texas School Districts and Counties:1993 Page: E32
[88] p.View a full description of this report.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
APPENDIX E
COUNTY PROPERTY RATES 1991-92County Only
ISD RATIO* Rate
Kaufman
Kendall
Kenedy
Kent
Kerr
Kimble
King
Kinney
Kleberg
Knox
Lamar
Lamb
Lanpasas
LaSalle
Lavaca
Lee
Leon
Liberty
Limestone
Lipscomb
Live Oak
Llano
Loving
Lubbock
Lynn
Madison
Marion
Martin
Mason
Matagorda
Maverick
McCulloch
McLennan
McMullen
Medina
Menard
M dland
M lam
MIlls
Mitchell
Montague
Montgomery
Moore
Morris
Motley
Nacogdoches
Navarro
Newton
Nolan
Nueces
Ochiltree
Oldham
0-ange
Palo Pinto
Panola
Parker
Parmer
Pecos
Palk
Patter
Presido
Rains
Randall
Reagan100.6%
98.1%
94.3%
103.7%
100.9%
89.7%
99.7%
101.6%
97.2%
97.4%
97.9%
100.3%
99.5%
94.6%
96.8%
98.7%
99.2%
100.4%
96.4%
96.3%
96.6%
96.6%
100.6%
99.1%
128.6%
101.0%
102.6%
100.4%
100.6%
97.9%
98.9%
98.1%
97.8%
98.3%
100.4%
99.8%
97.8%
100.4%
101.0%
98.9%
98.4%
97.3%
100.4%
114.7%
105.0%
95.3%
99.1%
119.2%
97.2%
100.7%
101.9%
107.1%
100.2%
101.0%
98.7%
98.1%
97.9%
100.5%
102.7%
98.2%
92.3%
102.4%
97.6%
93.3%Countywide Special Districts
Rank College Hospital Other
$0.373
0.313
0.370
0.222
0.283
0.327
0.298
0.666
0.463
0.538
0.326
0.181
0.289
0.561
0.364
0.364
0.174
0.508
0.384
0.343
0.517
0.280
0.420
0.175
0.513
0.784
0.490
0.310
0.519
0.269
0.183
0.365
0.330
0.388
0.411
0.389
0.222
0.250
0.495
0.381
0.358
0.475
0.243
0.256
0.819
0.266
0.279
0.740
0.399
0.297
0.510
0.756
0.429
0.398
0.364
0.367
0.305
0.233
0.523
0.378
0.326
0.664
0.248
0.355128
181
129
239
205
169
195
14
76
43
170
247
199
37
138
137
249
60
118
160
53
208
94
248
54
8
70
183
52
217
246
135
168
116
100
115
238
230
66
121
146
73
232
225
7
218
210
10
108
196
57
9
89
109
136
134
187
234
51
125
171
16
231
149$0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.063
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.117
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.119
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.148
0.060
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000$0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.206
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.436
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.099
0.000
0.000
0.088
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.109
0.272
0.000
0.092
0.251
0.000
0.102
0.219
0.201
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.379
0.173
0.000
0.000
0.294
0.000
0.182
0.032
0.000
0.110
0.071
0.000
0.000
0.226
0.204
0.153
0.000
0.000
0.129
0.000
0.066
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.074
0.000
0.000
0.196Total True
Rate Rank$0.078
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.134
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.139
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.033
0.014
0.000
0.052
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.031
0.000
0.078$0.451
0.313
0.370
0.222
0.304
0.533
0.298
0.666
0.463
0.974
0.326
0.188
0.289
0.561
0.364
0.463
0.174
0.508
0.473
0.476
0.522
0.280
0.420
0.291
0.785
0.784
0.582
0.581
0.519
0.372
0.402
0.566
0.393
0.388
0.411
0.768
0.513
0.250
0.495
0.676
0.358
0.657
0.414
0.256
0.929
0.337
0.398
0.740
0.625
0.534
0.677
0.756
0.480
0.545
0.513
0.493
0.305
0.233
0.523
0.378
0.400
0.695
0.248
0.629E-32
Cc unty
125
207
178
247
213
89
217
42
120
7
201
252
221
75
180
121
253
103
117
115
93
227
144
220
19
20
68
69
94
177
158
74
166
168
152
21
97
242
107
38
186
46
148
238
11
196
163
24
59
88
37
22
114
81
98
110
212
244
92
175
159
31
243
54
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Texas Research League. Appraisal Practices of Texas School Districts and Counties:1993, report, April 1993; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth1544672/m1/60/: accessed July 17, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.