Texas Register, Volume 14, Number 78, Pages 5585-5650, October 20, 1989 Page: 5,611
5585-5650 p. ; 28 cm.View a full description of this periodical.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
lion. There is no anticipated economic cost to
indvidkals who are required to comply with
the section as proposed.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted
before December 1, 1989, to Paula Cochran
Carter, Legal Counsel for the Texas Racing
Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas
78711.
The amendment is proposed under Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, 3.02, which pro-
vide the commission with the authority to
adopt rules for conducting racing involving
wagering and for administering the Texas
Racing Act.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal
has been reviewed by legal counsel and
found to be within the agency's authority to
adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas on October 13, 1989.
TRD-080972 Paula Cochran Carter
Legal Counsel
Texas Racming Commision
Earliest possible date of adoption: November
20, 1989
For further information, please call: (512)
476-7223
fA
Subchapter D. Drug Testing
Provisions for Horses
* 16 TAC 319.365
(Editor's Note: The Texas Racing Commis-
sion proposes for permanent adoption the
new section it adopts on an emergency basis
in this issue. The text of the new section is in
the Emergency Rules section of this issue.)
The Texas Racing Commission proposes
new 319.365, concerning laboratory provi-
sions for testing splits. The section requires
the laboratory to be licensed by the commis-
sion and qualified under the Act to provide
drug testing services.
Paula Cochran Carter, legal counsel for the
Texas Racing Commission, has determined
that for the first five-year period the section is
in effect there will be no fiscal implications for
state or local government as a result of en-
forcing or administering the section.
Ms. Carter also has determined that for each
year of the first five years the section is in
effect the public benefit anticipated as a result
of enforcing the section will be the assurance
that pari-mutuel racing will be of the highest
integrity. There will be no effect orn small
businesses as a result of enforcing this sec-
tion. There is no anticipated economic cost to
individuals who are required to comply with
the section as proposed.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted
before December 1, 1989, to Paula Cochran
Darter, Legal Counsel for the Texas Racing
Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas
78711.
The new section is proposed under Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, 3.02, which pro-
vide the commission with the authority to
adopt rules for conducting racing involving
wagering and for administering the Texas
Racing Act.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposalhas been reviewed by legal counsel and
found to be within the agency's authority to
adopt
Issued in Austin, Texas on October 13, 1989.TRlO-0783
Paula Cochr Carter
Legal Counsel
Texas Racing CommissionEarliest possible date of adoption: November
20, 1989
For further information, please call: (512)
476-7223
TITLE 22. EXAMINING
BOARDS
Part XXII. Texas State
Board of Public
Accountancy
Chapter 511. Certification as
CPA
CPA Examination
* 22 TAC $511.87
The Texas State Board of Public Accoun-
tancy proposes new 511.87, concerning the
CPA examination. The section provides for
forfeiture of grades if a canddate does not
pass the entire examination within the pre-
scribed time. In addition, this section requires
the board to notify a candidate when they
may be subject to such forfeiture.
Bob E. Bradley, executive director, has deter-
mined that for the first five-year period the
section is in effect there will be no fiscal
implications for state or local government as
a result of enforcing or administering the sec-
tion.
Mr. Bradey also has dek.rmined that for each
year of the first five years the section is in
effect the public benefit anticipated as a result
of enforcing the section will be to conform
with new amendments to the Act. There will
be no effect on small businesses. There is no
anticipated economic cost to persons who are
required to comply with the section as pro-
posed.
Comments on the proposal ,, y be submitted
to Cynthia Hairgrove, Attorney, 1033 La Po-
sada, Suite 340, Austin, Texas 78752-3892.
The new section is proposed under Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 41a-1, 6(a) , which
provide the Texas State Board of Public Ac-
countancy with the authority to promulgate
rules concerning forfeiture of grades.
511.87. Loss of Credit.
(a) Any candidate having earned
conditioning credit under this Act or a prior
Act and who has three examinations re-
maining before the forfeiture of credits
earned, shall be notified prior to each exam-
ination of these facts.
(b) Any candidate failing to receive
credit for all subjects within the time limita-
tion of this Act shall be notified that credits
have been forfeited, and this action shall be
ratified by the board.(c)
not hinder
reapplyingThe forfeiture of credits shdull
an examination candidate from
for the examination.This agency hereby certifies that the proposal
has been reviewed by legal counsel and
found to be within the agency's authority to,
adopt
Issued in Austin, Texas on October 13, 1989.TRD-90827
Bob E. Bradley
Executive Director
Texas State Board of
Public AccountancyEarliest possible date of adoption: November
20, 1989
For further information, please call: (512)
450-7066
TITLE 37. PUBLIC
SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONS
Part V. Board of Pardons
and Paroles
Chapter 145. Parole
Revocation of Administrative
Release (Parole, Mandatory
Supervision, and Executive
Clemency)
* 37 TAC 145.41, 145.45,
145.48-145.50
The Board of Pardons and Paroles proposes
amendments to 145.41, 145.45, 145.48-
145.50, concerning allegation of violation: re-
view and initial disposition; procedure after
waiver of revocation hearing; pre-revocation
hearing conference; purposes; procedure;
rights of the administrative releasee in the
revocation process; administrative release
preliminary hearing. The amendments will
clarify language used in rules.
Harry C. Green, general counsel, has deter-
mined that for the first five-year period the
sections are in effect there will be no fiscal
implications for state or local government as
a result of enforcing or administering the sec-
tions.
Mr. Green also has determined that for each
year of the first five years the sections are in
effect the public benefit anticipated as a result
of enforcing the sections will not be applica-
ble, as the public is relatively unaffected by
these particular proposed sections. There will
be no effect on small businesses as a result
of enforcing these sections. There is no antic-
ipated economic cost to individuals who are
required to comply with the sections as pro-
posed.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted
to Harry C. Green, 8610 Shoal Creek Boule-
vard, Austin, Texas 78758, or P.O. Box
13401, Austin, Texas 78711.
The amendments are proposed under the
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article
42.18, 15(a), which provides the Board of
Pardons and Paroles with the authorty to
clarify language used in rules.. Propose Setos Otbe 0 99 14TxRg51
* Proposed Sections
October 20, 1989 14 TexReg 5611
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Periodical.
Texas. Secretary of State. Texas Register, Volume 14, Number 78, Pages 5585-5650, October 20, 1989, periodical, October 20, 1989; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth216067/m1/26/: accessed July 16, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.