UNT Libraries Government Documents Department - 494 Matching Results

Search Results

Results: 1 - 50 next
Texas Attorney General Open Records Decision: Number 676 (ORQ-40)
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John Cornyn, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Re-evaluation of Open Records Decision No. 574 (1990) regarding the scope of the attorney-client privilege under section 552.107(1) of the Government Code; whether section 552,001 of the Government Code also encompasses the attorney-client privilege; whether the attorney-client privilege is mandatory and compelling for the purposes of the Public Information Act; and related questions.
Texas Attorney General Open Records Decision: Number 677 (ORQ-41)
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John Cornyn, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Re-evaluation of Open Records Decision No. 647 (1996) regarding the scope of the attorney work product privilege under sections 552,103 and 552.111 of the Government Code in light of the repeal of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166(b) and the adoption of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.5.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-70
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Constitution would have to be amended in order to provide retirement, disability and death benefits to officers and employees of the political subdivisions of Jefferson County.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-86
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether 100% of the rental receipts received by a corporation, for the leasing of equipment, is “business done in Texas” regardless of where they are used, for purposes of the allocation formula in Article 12.02, V.C.S.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-87
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether credit unions should report personal property subject to escheat under Article 3272a, V.C.S., or report their dormant or inactive accounts under Article 3272b, V.C.S.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-116
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Construction of Sec. 3, Art. IX of the Constitution relative to vote required for adoption of a county home rule charter.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-117
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether, in counties which have adopted voting machines, use of the machines is mandatory in primary elections, and related question.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-131
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Construction of H.B. 86, and Appropriation Cill, regarding “other operating expenses.”
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-132
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Interpretation of the scope and extent of the rule-making power of the Savings and Loan Commissioner and the Building and Loan Section of the Finance Commission with reference to specific sections of the new Texas Savings and Loan Act, codified as Article 852a, Vernon’s Civil Statutes.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-212
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Federal Census is the exclusive basis for determining population of a city with respect to requirement for obtaining exemption certificates, under the provisions of the Election Code as amended by the 58th Legislature.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-232
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Texas Education Agency should, in determining the economic index and in calculating the amount of local funds to be charged to each school district in Harrison County, remove from the total “value added by manufacture” the value of products manufactured on federally-owned military reservations in Harrison County.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-323
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether persons in military service are required to be registered voters in order to vote for federal offices.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-340
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the interference with riparian rights of access by construction of a highway bridge with a fender system in a navigable stream constitutes a taking of property within the meaning of Article I, Sec. 17, Constitution of Texas.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-369
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Qualifications for voting in an election held under Article 1243, R.C.S., for abolition of corporate existence of a city.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-428
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether it is proper for the County Clerk to require an additional costs deposit of the appellee for any certified copies that he requests to go to the District Court as the result of a perfected appeal from the Probate Court.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-475
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether personal property held in Texas by foreign corporations for persons whose last known address is outside Texas or is unknown are required to be reported to the State Treasurer under Article 3272a; and whether unclaimed wages must be reported pursuant to such statute?
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-491
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: When is the Commissioners Court of Midland County required to provide funds for the establishment and operation of the Court of Domestic Relations in and for Midland County, Texas, established by House Bill 1158, Acts 59th Legislature, 1965, and what salary is to be paid the judge of such Court?
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-492
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Constitutionality of the Misdemeanor Probation Law of 1965.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-517
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Commissioners Court may, acting under the provisions of Article 4494(L), V.C.S., lease the county hospital for a 99 year term with the express agreement that the lessee may encumber the land, existing buildings, and equipment for substantial improvements thereto, including the construction of new buildings and the purchase of new equipment.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-518
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether Texas is authorized to participate in the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, Public Law 88-578, and can receive and disburse funds for the purpose of the Act.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-554
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether, under the submitted facts, the National Hall, through its Board of Directors can qualify under Article 667, Vernon’s Penal Code, so as to be entitled to secure a license to sell beer.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-555
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether an election judge who delivers the returns of an election on the morning after the election instead of immediately after the votes are counted is entitled to any compensation for his services in delivering the returns and unused election supplies.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-576
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether Article 2922-L, V.C.S., governs the amount of collection fees a County Tax Assessor-Collector may receive or retain for his services in collecting the taxes for a rural high school district.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-640
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: When a barber school changes ownership, necessitating the drawing up of a new contract, whether the new owner can be required to bring the school up to the requirements as outlined in Section 9, H.B. 829, Acts 57th Legislature, 1961, and related question.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-641
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Responsibility for the cost of operating the Harris County Convalescent Ward.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-642
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Proper lists for the selection of qualified jurors.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-643
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether an officer, by virtue of a valid search warrant issued to search for a stolen TV set, also finds a typewriter which had been reported stolen at another time, may legally take possession of the typewriter and related questions; and construction of Article 42.13, C.C.P., relative to the stated facts.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-716
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a person granted probation pursuant to Section 6 of Article 42.12, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure (Adult Probation and Parole Law), may be required to pay court costs and the costs of a court appointed attorney as a part of the terms of probation.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-747
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Authority of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to Purchase land for salt water experiment pond.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-794
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Board of Regents of the University of Texas are required to permit Doctors of Osteopathy who are licensed to practice medicine to participate in postgraduate courses at medical institutions of the University of Texas.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-795
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Construction of the phrase used in Article 4565d and 4565g, V.C.S. “the fitting of contact lenses shall be done only under the direct supervision of a licensed physician or licensed optometrist as defined by the laws of this State.”
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-1
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Authority of the On-site Wastewater Treatment Research Council, and related questions (RQ-2165)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-79
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a juvenile board created pursuant to chapter 152 of the Human Resource Code has the power to hire and discharge employees of a juvenile probation department after it has employed a chief juvenile probation officer (RQ-136)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-80
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a municipal industrial development corporation may use funds generated by a sales tax for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, and operating a “for profit” hospital of clinic (RQ-101)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-81
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Validity of a rider to the General Appropriations Act that requires certain employees of state agencies to submit financial statements for review and approval by the board or commission to which the employees are responsible (RQ-198)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-82
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Corpus Christi Municipal Court has jurisdiction in certain cases involving the issuance of bad checks (RQ-222)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-83
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Application of Article III, section 47(b), of the Texas Constitution, which imposes limitations on the kinds of organizations that may conduct bingo games (RQ-255)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-84
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the owner of a restaurant in a dry area violates section 101.31 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code by giving away wine to patrons or using alcoholic beverages for cooking (RQ-38)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-99
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether certain governmental entities may lawfully deposit funds in the demand accounts of state and federal savings and loan associations and savings banks (RQ-220)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-100
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether an insurance company released from supervision or conservatorship may deduct from its premium tax liability fees paid for cost of rehabilitation (RQ-201)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-101
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the board of directors of the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority may designate by rule for use as impact assistance allocation not less than ten percent of the planning and implementation fees assessed and deposited to the low-level waste fund and related questions (RQ-267)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-136
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether rules recently enacted by the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners relating to HIV- and HBV-infected dental health care workers are inconsistent with subchapter I of chapter 85 of the Health and Safety Code (RQ-266)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-341
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted to prohibit racial discrimination in federally funded programs and related questions (RQ-778)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-357
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a county auditor may require the county attorney to prepare and submit, for inclusion in the county budget, a projection of revenues and expenditures for the county attorney hot-check fund for the following fiscal year and related questions (RQ-791)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-358
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether service by delivery to the premises under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 742a constitutes valid service of citation in a suit for rent joined with a suit for forcible detainer
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-363
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the recently enacted concealed handgun law, Senate Bill 60, particularly the provision to be codified as V.T.C.S. article 4413(29ee), section 32, permits a business owner or operator to post notices prohibiting license holders carrying concealed handguns from the premises of the business, and related questions (RQ-821)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-364
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a rapid transit authority established under V.T.C.S. article 1118x (to be recodified as Transportation Code chapter 451) may prohibit a concealed handgun licensee from carrying a concealed handgun on a public conveyance operated by the rapid transit authority; whether a city or county may prohibit a concealed handgun licensee from carrying a concealed handgun in a city or county park.
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-387
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a school district must comply with the competitive bidding procedures specified in Local Government Code chapter 271, subchapter B when seeking to bid a construction contract valued at $25,000 or more in the aggregate for a twelve-month period and related question (RQ-861)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-388
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether, without being licensed as an athletic trainer under article 4512d, V.T.C.S., a coach may have as his or her primary job responsibility working with or on injured athletes and a related question (RQ-845)
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-442
Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the Department of Banking may enforce the Currency Exchange Act, article 350, V.T.C.S., on a gambling facility owned by the Kickapoo Indians on their reservation in Eagle Pass, Texas (RQ-926)
Back to Top of Screen