48 Matching Results

Explore Results

Results: 1 - 24 next

[Affidavit of B. I. Terry]

Description: Affidavit sworn by B. I. Terry, attesting to the circumstances under which she acquired her property in Comanche County, Texas. This affidavit is unsigned.
Date: January 1919
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Affidavit of B. I. Terry]

Description: Affidavit sworn by B. I. Terry stating the circumstances under which she purchased her property in Comanche County, Texas. This document is unsigned.
Date: May 1919
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Affidavit of B. I. Terry]

Description: Affidavit sworn by B. I. Terry stating the circumstances under which she purchased her property in Comanche County, Texas. This document is unsigned and has corrections to the text in pencil.
Date: May 1919
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Application No. 25,071: Reply Brief of Defendant in Error To Application For Writ of Error.]

Description: Document in application no. 25,071, W. O. Rainwater vs. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company, presenting the defendant in error's reply the application of writ of error. The brief lists the documents relevant to the cause, details how the cause progressed through the lower courts, and presents prior cases supporting the defendant's argument.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause 1988: Appellant's Reply to Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

Description: Document stating the appellant's, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company's, reply to the appellee's, W. O. Rainwater's, motion for rehearing. It states that the appellant relies on the cases, Clonts v. Johnson and Texas & N. O. R. Company vs. Whisenant.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles, Jack
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause 1988: Brief of Appellant]

Description: Document detailing the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company's reasons for appealing in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater. Included are the Statement of Nature and Result of the Suit, Appellate Jurisdiction, and Assignments of Error, Propositions, Statements, Authorities, and Arguments.
Date: 1940~
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

Cause No. 11551: Plaintiff's Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 11551, Tomlinson, Paschall & Colvin vs. The Independent Torpedo Company, detailing the complaints of Mollie Lee Tomlinson, W. R. Tomlinson, Crigler Paschall, and J. D. Colvin against the Independent Torpedo Company. The plaintiffs seek recourse for damage to their oil well in Erath County, Texas by the shooting done by the Independent Torpedo Company.
Date: unknown
Creator: Chastain & Judkins
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Agreement to Accept Testimony of John Thompson]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. et al. vs. United States Torpedo Company, stating the attorneys of the plaintiffs and defendant agree that the testimony of John Thompson, taken by L. D. Hillyer, is admissible in the cause.
Date: unknown
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Notice of Deposition of L. D. Hillyer]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. et al. vs. United States Torpedo Company, providing notice to the plaintiff about the deposition of L. D. Hillyer. The notice includes the questions posed to Hillyer which discuss Hillyer's transcript of John Thompson's testimony.
Date: unknown
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Second Original Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. and Frank R. Ellis vs. United States Torpedo Company, describing Hamon and Ellis's complaints of the torpedo company and listing the damages they claim they are entitled to. The suit regards damage to Hamon's and Ellis's oil well in Eastland County, Texas caused by a representative of the United States Torpedo Company.
Date: 1925~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Supplemental Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. et al. vs. United States Torpedo Company, stating that the United States Torpedo Company is liable for negligence.
Date: unknown
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion for Rehearing]

Description: Document in the cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, detailing the appellant's arguments for rehearing the cause. It lists prior cases that support their motion and the errors in the process of the court. This copy appears to be a draft and has editing marks and correction in pencil.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion for Rehearing]

Description: Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, discussing the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company's reasons for requesting a rehearing. It states that the court erred in remanding the cause and lists several prior cases to support the company's argument.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Transcript]

Description: Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, in which the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company requests to have a corrected transcript filed in the cause. The motion discusses the question of jurisdiction for the cause and lists prior cases to support the oil company's argument.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Transcript]

Description: Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, in which the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company requests to have a corrected transcript filed in the cause. The motion discusses the question of jurisdiction for the cause and lists prior cases to support the oil company's argument.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Reply to Appellee's Motion For Rehearing]

Description: Document stating the appellant 's reply to the appellee's motion for rehearing in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater. The reply references the cases Clonts vs. Johnson and Texas & N.O.R. vs. Whisenant as the basis for their appeal.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Brief]

Description: Document in the cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, stating the appellee's, W. O. Rainwater's, position in the cause and presenting several prior cases to support his position.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Smith, Gilbert
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

Description: Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, detailing the history of the cause in lower courts, assignments of error, propositions, and prior cases supporting Rainwater's motion.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Smith, Gilbert
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

Description: Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, detailing the history of the cause in lower courts, assignments of error, propositions, and prior cases supporting Rainwater's motion.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Smith, Gilbert
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Reply to Appellant's Motion for Rehearing and Appellant's Motion for Writ of Certiorari]

Description: Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, countering the oil company's motion for rehearing the cause. The document lists the events in the cause, Rainwater's rebuttal of the reasons put forth by the oil company, and prior cases which support Rainwater's argument.
Date: 1940~
Creator: Smith, Gilbert
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 1988: Motion of Appellant to File Brief]

Description: Motion from the appellant, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company, to file their brief of appeal. The document lists the reasons for missing the appointed deadlines for filing their appeal as a mistake made by the attorneys, and requesting that the court not penalize their client.
Date: 1939-11~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen