41 Matching Results

Search Results

Advanced search parameters have been applied.

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 14, 1930]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Co. vs. Fulton and Fulton vs Gulf Pipe Co. et all. The case had moved to the 104th District Court with no trail date set. Mr. Sayles was reaching out to Mr. Stephens to let him know that unless these cases are tried pretty soon it will be inconvenient for Mr. Sayles to participate.
Date: June 14, 1930
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 14, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating that resetting the Underwood case to the next week may not be possible due to another breach of the promise of marriage case that will be tried all week. However, it may be possible to reset it to the week of July 11. Sayles asks what Stephens wishes to do about the matter.
Date: June 14, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. A. Murphy to Bill Dickerson, June 15, 1939]

Description: Letter from Murphy to Bill Dickerson stating Sayles should prepare a form to be used on all leases to help secure affidavits among other documents. While there is an affidavit from other parties in Illinois enclosed, Murphy states it would likely not be signed and therefore should not be used. He suggests because of the length of time it would take to acquire information about these lands, the requirement for affidavits should be waved for the purpose of payment. He remits a copy he believes wi… more
Date: June 15, 1939
Creator: Murphy, J. A.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating he does not agree with Stephens' interpretation of another case against the Gulf Pipe Line Company as it requires too much of both parties involved. Sayles believes the trial judge may reset the time of the hearing during the same term of court.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from Darall G. Hawk to Sayles & Sayles, June 26, 1939]

Description: Letter from Darall G. Hawk to Sayles & Sayles regarding land interest of Earl Willard Meyer. Meyer was a minor when he inherited the deed for the land and needs a guardian to execute the deed. Hawk is unsure of a guardian's ability to convey an interest in the land when Meyer likely inherited other property from the estate.
Date: June 26, 1939
Creator: Hawk, Darall G.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from Jack Sayles to Darall G. Hawk, June 28, 1939]

Description: Letter from Jack Sayles to Darall G. Hawk discussing the interest of Earl Willard Meyer. Sayles discusses the law regarding the procurement of oil and gas leases from minors. The law outlines the steps to take to procure the lease from Earl. The lease terminates when the minor reaches twenty-one years of age unless there is production on the property. The real estate law relies on the guardian to determine if the land is to be partitioned. Sayles does not believe it wise to sell Earl's interest… more
Date: June 28, 1939
Creator: Sayles, Jack
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from Paul Jones to Perry Sayles, June 4, 1936]

Description: Letter from Paul Jones to Perry Sayles discussing a check Mr. Sayles wrote to The Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Abilene, Texas. Mr. Sayles wrote a check for $15 towards a note owed to the bank of the amount of $48.50. Mr. Jones split the check as $13.50 on the principle and $1.50 as interest on the note balance for 90 days.
Date: June 4, 1936
Creator: Jones, Paul
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1930]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton case. Sayles states that the way he received continuance of the case was to transfer them to the 104th District Court and to give Fulton a quick trial. He states there may be difficulty in postponing these cases.
Date: June 18, 1930
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen