8 Matching Results

Search Results

Results: 1 - 8

[Letter from David W. Stephens to Wilfrid E. Lessing, May 3, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to W. E. Lessing discussing the Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company suit. Sayles states he has shown the form of order to sustain Gulf Refining Company's plea and that Stephens had no objection to this case being transferred.
Date: May 3, 1926
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1930]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton case. Sayles states that the way he received continuance of the case was to transfer them to the 104th District Court and to give Fulton a quick trial. He states there may be difficulty in postponing these cases.
Date: June 18, 1930
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, May 2, 1932]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles moving to take non-suit in Sam Underwood's case against the Gulf Refining Company. Stephens has no objection against the case being transferred to the 104th district court and requests Sayles enter the county court orders.
Date: May 2, 1932
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, April 29, 1930]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating W. E. Lessing agreed to withdraw a non-suit so long as the Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company suit was moved to the 104th District Court.
Date: April 29, 1930
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen