244 Matching Results

Search Results

[Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson, 1932-06-27]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson discussing the amount of work this project requires and the time that Sayles would be away from his own law practice in Abilene. Sayles states that work is tentative and the discussion is not a binding contract. He asks about length of time in St. Paul, salary and royalties paid.
Date: June 27, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson, June 22, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson addressing concerns Sayles has about the job in St. Paul, but that he is willing to try to reach an agreement when certain aspects of the position are more clear.
Date: June 22, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens, May 3, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens discussing the court cases, Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company in both the county and districts courts.
Date: May 3, 1932
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from Sayles & Sayles to T. H. Neel, 1932]

Description: Letter from Sayles & Sayles to T. H. Neel stating it's unnecessary for Fielding to appear because the case, Underwood v. Gulf Refining Company was dismissed by the court.
Date: 1932?
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to M. B. Wilhoit, December 3, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to M. B. Wilhoit endorsing the inclusion of forms. Sayles does not want to do the extra work of preparing forms but believes they would add value to the book. Sayles is reluctant to undertake a work with which he knows he will be dissatisfied and states he does not approve of all of Stayton's forms.
Date: December 3, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from H. J. Scott to Perry Sayles, August 9, 1932]

Description: Letter from H. J. Scott to Perry Sayles discussing Sayles' non-payment of one month's payment on a loan granted by the Standard Savings and Loans Association.
Date: August 9, 1932
Creator: Scott, H. J.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, July 2, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles discussing editorial machinery available at St. Paul as well as the editorial and clerical assistance provided. Pearson also states his opinion on what would be the best form of work and compensation.
Date: July 2, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens, April 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens discussing the effects of the plaintiffs in the case, Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company, filing a motion for nonsuit.
Date: April 18, 1932
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson, November 26, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson stating that a suit Sayles needed to settle before leaving for St. Paul has been moved to January which may delay his departure. Sayles also mentions the book without the appropriate forms would detract from its value. Sayles also files for a writ of mandamus for the district judge with no help from other form books.
Date: November 26, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from M. B. Wilhoit to John Sayles, July 4, 1932]

Description: Letter from M. B. Wilhoit to John Sayles discussing a more realistic sales goal from Pearson and potentially working in St. Paul to finish producing the editorial volumes.
Date: July 4, 1932
Creator: Wilhoit, M. B.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson, October 29, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson discussing a case that needs to be settled before Sayles is able to go to St. Paul, as the Supreme Court needs to pass on his application before he leaves Abilene. Sayles states a potential need to stay in Abilene a while longer.
Date: October 29, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel in which John Sayles is asking if Mr. Neel is the attorney for N. E. Fielding. If Mr. Neel is the attroney John Sayles ask for home to sign and return an agreement for the resetting of the Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company court case.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, June 24, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles discussing the size of the job to create a work on Texas Practice, and mentions relocation to St. Paul.
Date: June 24, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, October 5, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles discussing a trip Pearson will take to visit Dallas and that he would like to meet with Sayles while there.
Date: October 5, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter to J. E. Pearson, December 12, 1932]

Description: Letter to J. E. Pearson, most likely written by John Sayles, discussing Sayles' submissions to the Vernon Law Book. This letter has corrections to the text and is unsigned.
Date: December 12, 1932
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, October 24, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles discussing the best way to produce the work is the way already described previously. Pearson also mentions the general planning of the work as well as royalty compensation and how that will be allocated. Sayles is offered a higher advancement and paid travel to St. Paul.
Date: October 24, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen