The Tulia Herald (Tulia, Tex.), Vol. 61, No. 3, Ed. 1 Thursday, January 16, 1969 Page: 4 of 24
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: Tocker Foundation Grant and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the Swisher County Library.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
PAfif 4
TNI TllllA. ISwIiktf C••a t y) MIIAID
THURSDAY, JANUARY 16. 1969
Dear Editor
Di-turbicj; thing- tia: bfrsw a -
cro- ♦.**• urr.
solution You £ yos. taw «crw*-
p -o bad that yea cal tkak
of enough adjecuve- of a ai«
crow d wont aik.* you ta txpres-
vour coaKMpt foe th* tr*ar ws
call ban a *t ondroe'’ *34 "J3e
who!*? thing i« _c Have k«*t
'thought tLa; -• -u«_jc: tie &pto-
man- enough to txpk»re tse par-
tel of oar apuoMt it p*>«
\»h<-T>er it be- «* man * a Aci,-
-and
A dialogue »ab a fneod He
spent -*.era. y.a.-- .-icTri b ippcc*
around tfx C«nobeaa and I site*
be k»e* the answer- to my que^
turns
B»-er. :*>M that oefort Castro *.<*:*
over t*a: forty -bouNaiwl *t<7>r£
rtvame-i -J*- ssrwts at Havana at
s~gt‘ to make a Irratf Is that
true '
rr»d Y«-> s.: Those aid' —
are jost as taxi a»
Have are* :aad that «Va Caszro
:cw* cner se :.<ak tbetr. ctt the
sweets aad p*r tbeas s <es* mg
pcSmbC- aid <«neraJ other like
peaces to e a r l bread for them
*Jvr- a»d thej dependent- L-
tka: true'
Fneod Yes sx He sore did
that very tluu:
»ed »?.*:. .- so eni a&out that"’
No aa-'aief
Head a reprr*. tit* lac week on
scene tic^s as R^s-.a One on
tscxot They have the highest
ram her of M edical doctors per
capeta of any nation in the world
Ni f-achvd thui**hd ail totaled
No one x Ra-s_a goe- without
meets, a. aid ^ d i? needed
Remember so well the 1*17 re-
volution in Russia The (Teat ma-
jority were living boles in the
ground like gophers and eating
horse meat cooked in bear grease
They lived to the average age of
thirty-five Non Uieir average is
better than seventy Probably eigh-
ty percent could neither read or
ante his own name
Why don A they turn a round
and go hack to the good old days'*
Now the man that says I am a
Communist is not capable of plow-
i n g over two inches dec He
should learn to plow a foot deep
and then he would enjoy living a
lot better
Have a lot of respect for Gov
Reagan At the end of the first
vear of Medicare Governor Rea-
gan slapp»d his by* down on it.
Get that nv-ss straightened out.”
Rea -on ’
Alarm Is Voiced Over
Corporate Farm Threat
on Christian principles and be -
cause of this has enjoyed the suc-
re-- of superior technological a -
biline*
Without your statement concern-
ing the faith of the Astronauts, we
m.ght rM have pondered the fact
that when till- nation sought out
A delegation of 16 concerned plosive problem- of our cvr.tr...
Ik
Texans representing farm organ;
zation', business, state govern-
ment, and the n*-w- media, at -
tended a National Seminar on Cor-
poration Farming in De- M int
Iowa, Saturday The Seminar wa>
sponsored by the National Farm-
ers I’mon, and was attended by
several hundred farm and rural
leaders who are alarmed by the
accelerated movement into agn - c-ham-
culture of corporate and nondarm
interests
Texas Farmer-
elite- and urban area- in iu«l;r.g p»:rrjniv.
fiexxhng of the iuDor marx-: ., t,.rr'
unskilled workers
to offer signatures of
If large corporation- and n in-
form .ntere-t- bet me predominant
in agriculture, the need for many
Main street r>u-in* ->c - - '• *>1 - and
churches and municipal facilitie-
will be eliminated It will destroy
jobs and opportunities for mer •
bankers and profi --ionai . - ed agem ie-
ihi- letter complete with all lo-
cal and area -igr.ature- will be
mu.led to th- -elf - styed athie-t
in Austin
Coppies of th:- letter will be re-
lea-ed to all news media-. gov-
ernment officials N VS A Spa e (en-
ter. Astronauts.
Snead Rites
In Amarillo
Funeral -mice- for Ray Mlison
her best men to do what no other Snead. Sr , 71, of Amarillo were
men or nation has done, she chose held Iriday morning in Griggs l'lo-
men to whom God i> real and neer Chapel.
lrv.nf. Dr Harrv Vanderpool. pastor of
‘ Thank vou f-r reminding us that the Polk Street Methodist church,
ath. i-m h- nothing to offer but officiated Buna w a s in Llano
offense nothing to contribute ‘-emetery
but I rule i-m
Thank you for making us see the
contribution- ■( atheism to our so-
ciety We have never seen an
Mhei-tic Memorial Hostpial" —a
<1 Slllf®®
By H. M. BAGGARLY
( oeumed from page 1>
mtuu -n stre x>z a Bar M.tr. ah >x a
baptism
VHESE ACTS INVOLVE not the r^dy of rv..g*>r.
I bu- he practK-e- o4 it The l S Supreme
f -ur m against a scriool - -poc-ored practice
of r* .. n tff *£*jl< a school - ‘p*sored
study of religmo
The t * supreme Court mdx.a’ed that a
- - eight pr-n-«r a course <« the h:«t-*ry 4
r . r. -e mparat.ve rei;av<r.- or a course on the
H r,,- TV • 2' involve the -tody at religicat whKh
pr.iptrly be r.g- under the direction of the school
A LTHOUGH THE SCHOOL MAY no* spoftaor a
AA of religion, the student may The
sch iol mu-' ra- neutral toward religion the student
<i<c - r--* .e to be TV court ruled against a
schiol prj.ef but tka against a student prayer
1* >u * as un. on-titutKjnai to stop a student
fn»m pray r . a- it i- to make him pray So long
a- it doe- o--* nterfere witn the right- of other-.
any indivd^-l. m ludtng a student may practice
hi- r- . .r iryw*> e even in school
4PHE SUPREME COURT did noi remove religion
I from the puMic schools the variou- com-
min.'a f- parin'-, the teathen, the school
board- did
l ninf'- .r.ed tear tier- an unconcerned public.
ur.;!1 nr -j • ju hmen — a'l have had rhnr hand in
- u-n -ti< i iminating all mention of the Bible
and r . t. !r«*m -.erufKant area- of -chool life
TV cFur ■ laxuely union-dciu- of the good
[ thj' ■ i *n- from the proper u-e of the Bit>le
aid rel . r n tV- v.hooL-, ha- withdrawn from
’ pir.iie idt. ai.on
The publi- uncon<em*-d. has been csintc-nt to
tnir.k t . -t.ere could be no mention of religion in
/ a jaiblic <x bool
T< I'her jnin‘orm»-d about the legal u-es of
| B * :r •: r-: . .on have tended to u-<- th* m illegal-
ly M ■ ' i- . ifpmN that our real pro-
b « m w;*t r> :gi*on m the -chool n> -imply a mi*-
* i. '.-ndiri. <>f trie p* gjb a rtself.
- > POW MANY AMERICANS WOULD HAVE thing-
an; other wav’ How many Church of (hn*t
I re nt- would wan* a Catholic to recite the ro-ary
j in a cUvsrooaa?
How rr ,iy ('atlvilic parent- would want their
i ildren t [larticipat*- in a Communion service
i r'lu ''d by a Methodist’
How many Bap'i-t parents would want their
childn-n t . b* told that they had to b«' baptized in
i ordcT to -aved?
Common en-e tell- u- that in a country whc-rc
wi have th> fr1-dom to practice religion acs ording
i to our eon*c.‘ nc« -. or to leave it alone altogether,
for that matt'T. the practice cannot tw conducted
uroi-r the -pon-or hip of public -chugls.
J* 0 PAR AS THE Su|ir< me Court i- concerned, it
0 never trie a case It only review- decisions
I'.nh ' .!-»• ha- only 'ine trial where evidence is stile
rutted to a iudge or a fury, which arrives at a
. ilei i-ion atioui it This is the trial court
\ny ci -e may be appealed to other courts
where the trial court decision is reviewed These*
are appeals courts \n appeals court, up to and
including the Supierne Court, ne ver trie*s a case on
tin basis i>( the evidence Ihc-re is no jury in Ihe-
Supreme Court That court only reviews what
h.ip|H*ned ,.t the trial court and decides whether the
’ dn i-ior, -a- right or wrong
<>ii 'nal tiefore the Supreme Court is the* trial
c nurt de- i-ion rathcT than the case in question
fjJVERY PROBLEM th.il conns up for court uc
C lion i- assigned to some particular court for
trial in review Federal c ourts are assigned the re
view of any court dec ision where violation of right-
c guarantesd by the Constitution is at issue The
, c u-e- involving public -c hool- and religion were re-
if viewed by* the Supreme Court because those
1 In inmng -uit c laimed a violation of one nr more of
their Constitutional right-
No one ha- a right js*r se to have his case re-
* viewed by tin* Supreme Court That court alone
* dec ides whic h c a-e- it will review
When the Supreme* Court refuses to review a
j e.i-c the* deci-ion of the lower court stands This
does not neecssiinly mean agre«*mi*nt with that
decision, for there may Ik* other, technical rea-
'} seen- lc»r refu-mg to review
%A/HEN THE SUPREME COURT ehoo-c- to n
ww view a case, it can either affirm or reverse
the trial court decision The* Supreme Court ha-
both atfirmcd ;md reversed various trial court de-
cision- concerning religion in school-
Ihf Supi* me* Court i- limited to thi- lunetion
of affirming or rever-ing a previous decision Whc*n
t . - i)ur' c onmc nis beyond what is necessary for
iiyuig its a!(irm<ition or reversal, those com
it- c3iled ' dicta." h ive no legal force* \l •
oegh without legal force, dicta frequently Ik* -
1 *tr t;* most widely quoted |>ortion- of a tie-
c ..>n and are often a shadow of things to come
A
J
SUPREME COURT DECISION i- only a tudg
rn* nt passed on the outcome of a partic-
ular trial in a lower court
Any dec ision of any court applies only to the*
• • un it i c onsideration and to no other, no mat-
t i now -inular the circumstances This i.- why
•;*,< choc-e to ignore a c ourt decision, claiming,
ah a>m* legal accuracy, that the decision diK*-
„ppfy to their situation However, a decision of
Supreme Court on any particular matter indi-
» ite- hew it wou'cl probably rule on similar mat-
tor-
^^RiGINALLY, INDIVIDUAL states were free to
V/ they please* atvou* religion It was only
lliv federal government that 'as piohibtted from
pa- ing a law respecting an estabii-hment of re-
ligion that i- the federal government could make
neither a law REQl IRING a -tate - established re-
ligion nor — and we’ve aimo-t forgotten this — a
law PROHIBITING a state - e-tabh-hed religion
Originally it was con-id**red perfectly proper
for a <ate to have a state religion if it so cho-e,
and the federal government by virtue of the First
\m*ndmen* could not interfere
S', one time in their hi-tory. nine of the 13 origi-
nal colonies had state religions
The Congregational Church wa- the establish-
ed church in Ma--achus**tts. Connecticut, and New
Hamp-hire
The Ep-1copal Church wa- the established
church m New York. Maryland, \irgmia. .V^ih
Carolina South Carolina and G«*orgia
Four 't th«-^* -tate- maintained establi-hed
churche- for more than 25 years after the adoption
of the Eir-1 \mendment
MUT IN THE EARLY -tate - established
D religion- tie* a me a problem By 1H33 a ta-e
had made it- way to th** Supreme Court which in-
volved th<>-e who daim**d that state - e-tabli-hed
religion- were in violation of the I'nited State-
C*ici-titutK»n The Supreme Court, however refu-ed
to extend the restriction- of the religious dau-e-
of the Eir-t Amendmc nt to include the -tate- It
n*quired a Con-titutional am<*ndm**nt and a *a*rie-
of cciurt decisions to extend the restriction- on the
federal government to include -tate govemment-
a.s well
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT adopted in
I ISA- in the aftermath of the Civil VSar, -ays in
part No state -hall make or enforce any law
which -hall abridge* the privileges or immunities of
citizen- of the l nitc-d State s
(>ve*r the year- the Supr**mc* Court ha- been
called ujam repeatedly to identify th** privilege- or
immuniMe- ' of I'nited States citizens which may
n*>t be violated by the* states
In a l**40 case, the* Supreme Court firmly es-
tablished that the* religions clause- of the Fir-t V
mendment n*»w apply to state* governments, and
Ihu- to public -ehoeel- Thus the* stage* Was -e*t for a
series of |ie»-t World War II cases concerning re.*-
lion and the* public schools.
| ET US LOOK AT SOME of the* mo-t - aske-d
k question- concerning religion and the* public
-chool-
Did the Ceeurl ban the Bible and religion from
the public school-’
No! The courl banned an activity, not a book
or an area of study It banned im|>o-ing a redigiou-
philo-ophy on a youngster, but did not ban i.*X(io-ing
-tude*nt- to religion Iwlle-f- or religious literature
Why hies religion in the public schools suddenly
Ikm e»me* -uc h a great problem’
Politic- People* are* metre* inte*ri*-te*d m con
demning a Supreme* Court that maele* ihe*m angry
becaus** of racial integration than they are* in the
religious life of their children
|*ID THE COMMUNISTS have anything to do
W0 with limiting prayer anil Bible* reading in the
public school’
Of < out-e* not Contemptible as -onv of the*
eiti/e*n- whu brought Ihe -uil- are* (|K*ople* -urh ;i-
Madalyn Murray u llair) the y ate* loyal \me rte an-
whei have* the*ir own re*a-ons for m-i-ting that
the*ir own i hildre*n Ik* athe ist-
Should there* |** a C onstitutional ame ndme nt to
pe*rmit prayer and Bible* reading in the* public
schoeil-’
The re* already ha- been -ue h an amendment —
Ihe* very fir-t one*
Should a lu-tlci* be- ini|ie ,e< he*(l t»e•< au-e* of the
prayer and Bible* re ading de*< ision’
\ lu-tice* cannot Ik* impeachi'd for making a
decision over which the*re* is disagreement If thi-
WCTe* tiu** e*\ **i y justice would be* -ub|e*c t to im
|K*ai htn< nt on **ve*ry dec ision, since* neithinc g'x*- tei
the* Supri-m** c ourt unless th* re- i- genuine' and
rlcep di-agreement The Jeehn Birch Society -heeuld
read the- i on-iitution
■ S IT TRUE THAT ALL form - of i rime en<1 violence
I have increased since Hie Supreme c ourt limit-
ed prayer anel Bible reading in the* -chfeed’
of course However, it i- al-o true that the
-ame i ategorics of < rime* and violence we*n* on the*
merea-e long leefeere the* Supreme Court -|>eike on
prayer ;ind Bible reading in the* public -ihewel-
c'rime* anil vKelencx* have lK*e*n on the increa-e
-lnec* the be*ginning of World W;ir II if not Indore*
What about the teacher who deliberately di-
parages religion ’
The teacher i- wrong and unprofessional Re
ligmn -hould l» ne ither disparaged nor extolled by
the* public -chool teaehcr
When a teachc*r disbelieves the* R’ble or
lieves in the* theory of evolution, he ot -he mav
express his or her opinion -o tong a- u i
Libeled ;i jier-onal opinion e*r a theory ;tnd i- not
given Ihe dignity of In ing .in established fa t
AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH the Supn*me
AA Court - decision, a- you like* But for heaven
sake, lie honc-t' Don't accu-e it of doing things it
didn't do Base your judgment on the* facts, not
information di-]K*n-cd by the John Kirch Society
Billy Hargis. Carl Me Intire, and other government
haters
The thing that pu/zlcs us i- why do thc-e
“contrrncd people” not utilize those* avenues now
open to them if they are so interested in the spirit-
ual welfare of their children’ Why don't they take
steps to get a Bible course added to the school
curriculum’ Why don't they utilize all the oppor-
tunities their churchc - offer for the spiritual devel-
opment of their children’ Better still, whv don’t
they do in the* home that which they say they want
done in th<* public • hnnb •
and other inter- and • outer- vamed on in the
name of no - God and tell us,
ckx i.r.t' of rural tx<r. I v Irtltr f »i 1«#v% * foundt^d bv sacrificial sfift'* of dt‘di-
muni,> will also re-ait in an f Mr- Madalyn Murrav O'Hair .ati-d men w;intuig to -pread ath-
Lmon pf -idT,* caormous w a s t e of exi-ting Thaak you far Mu ad a .
W<WM. °* ^ ^ churct;. , ho-pitals a n d fine thing' for the ( hn Ban * How roanv nursing homes have
h b b t . ‘n • - muniaPal fatlliUes- been built by concerned alhiests
CToh hv T h * r"!" n e m r Th,J> community Iif.* Thanr: you fm ! » k.ng our con for aging non-believers’ And what
1 ir..x.- *r.- -rporation farm invas- • -n • tc r- d* j.tr iau>.r.g a *r tri out ion <<f comfort and peace
ion a human, a- well a- an no- (r ri-tian- cvcrywi: *,- to i.ik** a ath< ;-m make- whc*n one faces
noma protikm It is a problem new and m.*re -crious look at OCR death!
which demand- the* concern of all way of life jj,,. nation
Mr Snead dad Thursday morn-
ing in Northwe-t Texas Hospital
He wa- Ijorn at llo k a ell and
had lived in AmMillo since 19:a>
He had served a- Amarillo di--
f od and sleep mi--ion for down • lrR( supenntendc-nl o: the Texas
State Comptroller - Department
since coming to Amarillo
He had Ixen a memls r of the
Polk S'rivt Methodist church for
to ex -
corporation- in th. ir pian-
pand into agncultur*
"Thi- is a problem, which if n ••
dealt with imrm*diately, will toll
the death kn*Tl »o the rural com
mumtie- a- well a- th. commer-
cial family farm pattern of agri-
culture which i- - important a-
an efficient producer a- well a- a
social and economic <tabil:zer.''
N'aman poin’.-d out that the dom-
ination of agriculture by large
corporation- would have a signif;
cant impart '»n the- co-t of fcaKl
He -aid. the con-umer ha- a de-
finite stake in the movement of
corporation- into agriculture
They cannot produce a- efficient-
ly as independent farmer-, but will troduced by Congre-
u-c* their monopoly pu-iti'>n to a.l Smith, whn h would
mini-ter higher price- to the con-
sumer ”
\m<mg those attending the I>«*.-
Mome- meeting were repr* -er.*.i
tive- of high off'iial- of -'ate gov-
ernment. agricultural banking in -
tere-ts. university officials mem
ber- of th** new- media, and farm
organization leader-
Texas Farm.-r- I'nion official-
have called upon rural, bu-m<
religiou-, consumer, and farm or-
ganization leader- to i o i n with economic
them in the effort to combat c*or- thi the
Amencans
ACTION KEt OMMKNDATIONS
We recommend
ill the enactment of th Metcalf
Bill which would limit the write-
off of taxable non-farm income
again-t farm losses;
<2j the enactment of federal leg-
i-lation which would prevent cr- ^
poration- whose* primary -ource of
income are niit derived from farm-
ing. from engaging in farm pne
dui tion,
(3) the enactment of HR 676 in
man Neal
plait* weekly
limits on the number of cattle
-laughtercd by meat packer- from
their own b-edlot-.
iti the enactment of legislation
similar to that introduced by Sen-
ator Gaylord Nei-on which would
make credit available to young
farmers on a long term, low in
terest basis;
<3» the enactment of legislation
to give farmer- bargaining power
as a countervailing force to the
power of <*ot |n nation -
-trii t entoi 11 nv n' *f Us
you for making
Thank
fxjrder • line" rhri-tians realize
'he true* depth of their belief- and
to witness FOR Christianity.
By serving a- a catalyst to the
to the decay of moral fiber- m
*wa< begun by men
■* Bee au-e
oar great ration you have started that perhaps vour example - in -
a counter action that will far out-
weigh anv purpose you may a -
own right
Thank you for making u- awan*
that our nation wa- and i- ba-**d
30 year- and a meml>er of its
McDavid Sunday -chool da--
Survivors include his wife, Hazel:
three sons. Joe Y of Tascosa
Road. Ray A Jr of Dalhart and
Robert G of Midland two sis-
ters. Mr' All'e Billups and Mrs
\eo TdlLint l»oth of HcK'kwall and
seven grandchildren
There is seldom a dill moment in
a sweet pickle packing plant
Thank you for reminding Ameri-
ca that among her best men arc
reverse* will help us regain our those found in the ranks of that
-inctified common sense so that "magnificent minority called
In God We Tru-t” will not only ( hristian-
l>e :n-crilK*d *.n our com-, but on With sincere gratitude we* are*
our hearts a- well THE PEOPLE OF Tl !.I \
many and women -e*ek:ng God
of this. He has made us rich
and p*>we*rful It is true* that we
have slipped away from many
of the things that have made* u-
gn at But i- is exciting to think
[Miration farming The statewide 16b acre limitation provision in
general farm organization i ho|x federal reclamation law and *h.*
ful to have* a -tatutory |irohibition
again-t corporation farming in Tex-
as in'roduec-d into the -'ate* legi-
lature. and ha- asked the state
leadership to support this legisla-
tion
Other action to curb corpora -
tion farming which i- being asked
include the e-naetme-nt of federal
tax loopholes whn h encourage cor
porate diverstfu iition into agricul-
ture. federal laws to irmit the
feeding of livestock by pro. t nr-
and chiiin store- and to give far
mers and rancher- the legal an
thority to bargain for price, and
a fed. r;il program to tiroaden the
base of * r * cl11 availaole to young
farmer- and r.m< her- to a- it them
in staying in agriculture
Statement- and n commendation-
follow
Throughout lh<* year-, fiimily
farm agrt. ulture in I h e I 'nited
State- ha- proved to lx* .. reni.ul
ably efficient -y-t.*m for tfie pro
duet ton of abundant -upiilies of
fiMKl and fibre and the con-erva -
tion of th> nation land and wati ;
resources
The fiimily farm provide*- in
thousand- of rural communities,
the economic and -octal t»,« -r, for
community life for farm f..milie-
and non farm rural people It now
l-he- the v 11.1111v of a ho-t of -mall
bu-iness enterprise on th. M on
street- of the-** rural village and
towns
\n alarming trend in our time
i- the massive* inva-ton of agne ul-
ture* by corpeirate* and non farm
inte*re-t- There i- e*vide*n. .* H> d
the*-e* interest- are utilizing a num
bc*r of de*v u e - including \ «*rti...;
integration of fo<»l production t»\
conglomerate coi|*ir;ition- pu<
ehii-e*- of hug.* bloi k- of land tor
hi'dging and -pe*< ul.itive pur|Hi>.
and undermining of farm marke*t-
by |»ri. »• manipulation by pil -
ing of com|»*titive market-, and
mutually .............. iigree rn* nts
with e hi.in -tore- and hod hand-
ler- The* manipulation of marl *-
and the movement toward monop
oly ImkIi*- ill for Ihe ion-um>*r a-
we*l| ;i- for the fanner
The-c de*v tee- are made* po- ildc
anel alM'tted tiy the a* nlabllltv of
virluiilly unlimited capital a n T
ereuiit in Ihe hand- ed the-e .*■ *r-
porate giant- and by the pp .i-
ion- of tax l;iw- which make it
po—ible for i or[M>rati'>n- or in' * -
for- who an n*i' pr m erilv enga ■ I
;i- fi.rm o|M*rator- te> take advan-
tage of tax • lo— dedu.lions on
their farm opera’ion- aga n-t in
come pr'sluee.l Horn non farm <*n-
te'rpt l-e-
The* ill tIV tty of i.iljHUate .aid
non-farm mtere-i- n agtieuVun*
has resulted in eommoditv mat
k.*t p»i •• man1 (Mildion unreal; *i
cally high priev- for farm 1 rd
and the* driving of fiirm families
off the land The-.- farm families
ire fre*<|uently forced t . rrgrate ' ,
urban center- and into situatwn-
for which they are* ill ■ pre*p;er**d
which further aggravate- the • .
Twelve thousand doc tor- n jmrted
to the* Revenue D.*partment an in-
come of -ewenty thou-iind dollai -
I am only alMiut thirteen per
cent Republic m and eighty -.ven
percent Democrat
elc* of excess irrigated land held
by large landowners to famiy far-
mer- at reasonable* price
(7) the enactment by -tate* legis-
lature- of anti - corporation farm
a c t s which would prohibit or
sharply curtail th. activity of tor
poration in farming
•
Signatures Sought . . .
(Continued from p.igi lj
districts and given materials
Saturday, the letter will u* plac-
ed in the |*u-t National Ranh.
Holly - Ambutn I’iggly Wiggly,
Bob's, and t ire l. K tor additional
gnature- Anyone who >.a- not
contacted Friday and w:-hmg to
sign the lettc r may do -o at any
of ihe alxive merchant- on Satur-
day
Person are needed to volunteer
tun** on Saturday to work with
the letter iit th>- Imal mereh.int-
Tho-c iniere-ted in voiunteeting
t ime. are .t-kid to lx- pie-.n!
Friday evening at the Willie Room
Sunday local minister- will pre
-enl thi- letter to their congre
gallon- Till- Will Im* the final op-
11 hikes someone
Mho s not in iiolitii s
to tdkr fiolitii s <i|i«irl.
THE STATES
A v t rlink / rir
full e>( NT
moxfK <
United Thev * ell
if dnj ire
•Mi I
Ufcus -
ifkicr
I I'di'uii ft •-{-*«« Set rirr
Atlantc J 'U net
R A
Hart,
;»» >trt * ” n ft -a, a it'* V
"IME TEXAS COUSTHY EOi'OM
A roots loofc #*
Nat or>»l politics
to*Tvp»l*H b> I-jC|Are‘.V
• It - rue !u A IK in ,K*t .
M.f luh m t ■ n * »», f. pew it r
fhe St n I i n*ter
V» A t
I ib» ■> v J*ut ml
THE OSWALD Af f AtP
An f idmmdtion of thf»
Contrad.efton* and Orni^Eionf
of tha Warrart Heport
h ' / ti • Sa.< • tik'r
Saovxcc Mfifc« vxitk the ifklca*
\it> of an old f 4-hiont J KHjrn.tlot in
pitiM^it of a -tors ||t Arguments
fiiM tiouHmj 1,'jt•
A<N)n to be kmwcrtv
ons net JiEl!)
— The Ulmmtic
FITHKLL
Texa
At your bookoft ’o
THE WOULD Pl h. Sfii SC CO
CiavrUaU and New York
Let's Peer
Into your future —
<C LO M
-J
One step won’t take you very tar
You’ve g< t to keep on walking;
One word won’t tell ’em who you are.
You’ve got to keep on talking.
An inch won’t make you very tall.
You’ve got to keep on growing;
(» ie little advertisement won’t do it all.
You've got to keep them going.
Constant drops ol water will wear
Away the hardest stone;
By constant gnawing. l ow set
Masticates the toughest hone
The Constant, cooing lover
Ca" i :> - off the blushing maid.
And the constant advertiser
I- the one who gets the trade!
hi ay VYc Hcip You Wifh the Details?
Tuim Herald
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View 16 places within this issue that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
Baggarly, H. M. The Tulia Herald (Tulia, Tex.), Vol. 61, No. 3, Ed. 1 Thursday, January 16, 1969, newspaper, January 16, 1969; Tulia, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth507002/m1/4/?q=food+rule+for+unt+students: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting Swisher County Library.